You should then be able to track the device if it gets lost. The X performed poorly in the captured video quality test and was no match to the consistently performing Micromax X QUBE in the overall ratings. Micromax Dual 5 Review. The new skin packs a lot of animations, and we especially liked the look of the preinstalled Speedup memory management app.
|Date Added:||27 March 2012|
|File Size:||28.37 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Compare Micromax X510 Pike vs Nokia X3
We also wish that this phone shipped with the Android Nougat, which is becoming more common across price segments. Will this new phone be able to take on some of the biggest names in the market? The company offers a one-year free mocromax warranty, which is a segment first. Micromax calls it an "Arc design. We were impressed with Micromax Dual 5's ability to focus quickly, but it takes a long time to process images, which x50 irritate users.
There is a 3. Users can set up the Anti-theft app waplpapers linking a Google account to the phone. We found that the Dual 5 can take some decent selfies with good colour reproduction and details in the daylight, but ones taken at night don't have the same quality.
However, the sound quality through our own earphones was decent as well. It has two call function buttons: Read detailed Micromax Dual 5 review. It is slightly bulky weighing about grams.
Hot Free Micromax X PIKE HD Wallpapers | mobile9
Colours were vibrant and touch sensitivity was also excellent. We found that a 20 minute charge took the phone up from zero to around 40 percent, and it was fully charged in less than an hour. In addition, the narrowly spaced keys on the touch-screen keypad, hinders the movement of fingers and strongly emphasises the need for the stylus. The Dual 5's price and specifications seem to have been calibrated to make it compete directly with phones such as the Vivo V5 Plus ReviewSamsung Galaxy A5and Asus ZenFone 3 Review - all of which are priced at around the same level.
In our HD video loop test, the Dual 5 ran for 10 hours and 50 minutes, which is wallpapes, but we have seen better from other phones with similar battery capacities. The hybrid dual-SIM tray is also located on the left.
Xiaomi Mi Max Prime is another handset with GB storage and Snapdragon processor, but these are the only things common with the Dual 5. The phone also has an accelerometer, ambient light sensor, gyroscope, infrared sensor, and proximity sensor. The flexible battery cover can be removed using the marked nail grip, located at the bottom surface of the X As you can see, there are lots of preinstalled apps on this phone, but thankfully, quite a few of them are removable.
The home screen and the menu interface is not well organised and intuitive.
Micromax X510 Pike Games
In Mobiles and Tablets. Beyond this offer, Micromax also claims that it has made improvements to its mobie sales service network, and turnover time in metro cities is now one business day. Further, if no password is entered within 60 minutes of the SIM being pulled out, the phone can be wiped clean of personal data. App icons, quick setting toggles, and the Settings app have received a complete makeover. CONS It lacks a hardware keypad The touchscreen interface is quite sluggish and inaccurate Mediocre loudspeaker quality.
Information stored in this space is not accessible unless you unlock it.
You can achieve a bokeh effect, a feature that has lately been seen wa,lpapers a lot of phones. Domestic manufacturer Micromax was one of micrromax top smartphone vendors in the first half of Additionally, if someone attempts to unlock your phone, a photo of them can be taken and sent to an account of your choice. You can also find the two cameras, dual-tone LED flash, and fingerprint scanner at the back, all arranged in a symmetrical column down the middle.
This phone looks familiar from the rear, with antenna bands running across the top and bottom. But, that hardly justifies it to make a decent buy. The X performed poorly in the captured video quality test and was no match to the consistently performing Micromax X QUBE in the overall ratings.